Roles and Responsibilities: Health and Social Care Provider

Roles and Responsibilities Health and Social C be ProviderIntroduction In this assignment, I am going to explain how one health or social get by postr has contri preciselyed in national purvey and delimit three roles within the NHS and explain their responsibilities and possible complainter pathways. wolfram Cumberland infirmary is one of two abrupt hospitals in Cumbria, serving to a greater extent or less 140,000 residents of West Cumbria. The hospital is located on the outskirts of White puddlen, in Hensingham, and as strong provides Diagnosis/screening, c be for long-term conditions, Rehabilitation for illness/injury, 24 hour Accident and Emergency, CHOC, a consultant-led maternity unit, limited cargon baby unit, an out unhurrieds advantage and a mountain range of specializer clinical service. In 2015, a 90 million unsanded building was added to West Cumberland infirmary, the building contains advanced operative theatres and the new buildings internal and run ar e all modernised. The new modern build hits the hospital look more pleasing and attractive. However, issues and complaints give up occurred regarding centralising consultant-led maternity serve in Carlisle and women in labour whitethorn permit to travel to Cumberland Infirmary, this is due(p) to a shortage of childrens doctors, states the br a nonher(prenominal)hood Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust, and some kind of change is essential. The Hospital offers free National Health Service Treatment. Local GPs refer patients to outpatient clinics for specializer treatment and advice.Care Quality Commission (CQC) are independent regulators who make sure health and social care services provide peck with safe, effective, compassionate, high-quality care and encourage them to improve. Their inspection in 2015 on Whitehaven hospital cerebrate that the hospital dominated improvement and so was placed in special measures (CQC 2016).West Cumberland Hospital is manged by North Cu mbria University Hospital Trust which is an acute hospital swear committed to providing a high standard of care to a population of rough 320,000 from Carlisle, Allerdale, Eden, Copeland and parts of the Dumfries and Galloway and Northumberland. Services, such as pediatrics and AE, are provided from West Cumberland Hospital in Whitehaven and the Cumberland Infirmary in Carlisle. The trust also supports a wide range of symptomatic and clinical services which are located in nine community hospitals across North Cumbria. The trust became a university Hospital in homeember 2008.Within the NHS, in that location are large variety of positions which all require dissimilar specialist skills and training. Each job in health and social care settings is all- measurcapable(prenominal) in contri besidesing to providing the best quality care for service users.Roles, responsibilities and life pathways of a Doctor.Medical doctors examine, diagnose and treat patients who have been referred t o the hospital by GPs or other healthcare professionals. Doctors apply their specialist medical examination acquaintance and skills to the contribution of prevention and management of disease. afterward five historic period of medical school, a junior doctor will do a stripped of four years further training to qualify as a global practitioner (GP), or a further eight years to qualify as a hospital consultant. Once a registrar, after one year they whoremaster change state a GP, or a specialist consultant in five to sixsome years. in that respect are numerous responsibilities of a doctor. Doctors must undertake patients physical examinations and consultations, perform surgical operations, monitor and regulate medication of patients, plan and treasure required treatments of service users, communicate daily with nurses, doctors, GPs and other healthcare professionals and they also maintain records of patients. These responsibilities require a doctor to have an ability to sol ve problems, dissemble efficaciously under pressure and have leadership and management skills.Roles, responsibilities and charge pathways of a Radiographer.The role of a Radiographer is to undertake clinical imagining diagnostic examinations using different kinds of radiation to treat injured or ill patients. They must cover that every service user is fully aware of the procedure and stick around as comfortable and relaxed as possible. You empennage study to reach every diagnostic radiographer or therapeutic radiography at university. A diagnostic radiographer uses radiation to diagnose an injury or illness of a patient and a therapeutic radiographer uses different kinds of radiation to treat illnesses or injuries. It is important for a radiographer to have good communication skills and strong analytical skills.There are several responsibilities of a radiographer. They need to be able to assess patients and their clinical requirements to chink they endure which radiographic techniques to use. Radiographers also need to provide support and reassurance to patients, taking into account their psychological and physical needs. Taking responsibleness for radiation safety is also important. A radiographer will also work alongside radiologists and surgeons by taking part in more abstruse radiological examinations.A diagnostic radiographer seat become an advanced practitioner where they endure undertake a high level of clinical responsibilities. symptomatic radiographers also can go on to work at consultant level, where you will be able to contribute to strategic ontogeny of services.Role, responsibilities and career pathways of a paramedic.The role of a paramedic is to provide immediate reply to emergency 999 and 111 calls. Paramedics are usually the first senior healthcare professionals on the scene and the level of care they provide can range from upholding with minor illnesses and injuries to life threatening conditions.There are numerous respons ibilities of a paramedic. They must be capable of monitoring the patients condition and be able to use technical equipment, including ventilators and defibrillators to help stabilise and resuscitate patients, they must also perform surgical procedures if indispensable, such as intubation (inserting a eupneic tube). Paramedics will also communicate with other emergency services to ensure a suitable level of response is provided.EMTs and Paramedics are both well trained healthcare professionals. EMTs are trained to provide a introductory level life support to patients such as CPR, spinal immobilization, grassroots airway management and bandages and splinting, an EMT is considered the entry level for emergency medical services. An EMT can become a paramedic by undertaking a backside degree in Paramedic Science which will take around two or three years to complete. A paramedic can undertake extra training to become a specialist paramedic or take a further qualification depending on which qualifications they already hold, a specialist paramedic are advanced practitioners in dealing with emergency situations and they need to be able to understand situations quickly and suffer calm in stressful situations. A specialist paramedic can take further training of three to five years to become an advanced paramedic and once an advanced practitioner, a further six years to become a consultant paramedic. telly censoring proportion The US and UKtelevision set Censorship Comparison The US and UKTelevision Censorship ComparisonTelevision Censorship A Comparison mingled with the unite States and the unify commonwealthSince video became official in the 1930s, there have always been geographical disparities regarding to what degree different countries view video cloy as objectionable based on moral, religious or policy-making criteria. The process of preventing this foreign pith from r distributivelying audiences is known as security review, but blocking all unacc eptable cloth from television set system system is seen as a violation of emancipation of expression.However, although censorship is a heavily debated topic around the world, each sylvan has its own regulations and policies that vary significantly. In this comparative analysis, I will examine the different views on censorship and distant suffice in the United States and the United state. setoff I will plow the current regulations and censorship issues in the United States, as well as programs and content that have been deemed contrasted.Then, I will elucidate the censorship regulations in the United land, and discuss a recent television issue that sparked dispute over lackadaisical censorship policies. To finish, I will compare and personal credit line the two countries views on censorship, with an emphasis on why the United States and the United res publica have different perceptions about the degree of regulations necessary in their country.The United StatesIn the U nited States, censorship and other broadcasting policy-related issues are handled by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The FCC is an independent United States government activity agency, directly responsible to Congress. The FCC was establish by the Communications go of 1934 and is charged with ad still interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable. The FCCs jurisdiction covers the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. possessions (About the FCC).In the United States, obscene, im comme il faut and disconsolate broadcasts are taken very seriously, and based on the stiffness of their context, can be punishable by justness. According to the FCC, enforcement doings by office of archetypes, monetary fines or revoking channel licenses can be issued after a complaint is filed and a violation is confirmed. It is a violation of federal law to air obscene programming at any time.It is also a violation of federal law to air indecent programming or profane language during certain hours, which includes any content between 6am and 10pm (Obscene, Indecent, and sully Broadcasts). However, many people and organizations feel that the First Amendment of the Constitution, defending liberty of dialect and expression, is in direct violation by the FCCs enforcement of censorship.On the opponent side of the FCC are groups united against censorship regulations, claiming that censorship is an infringement of the First Amendment protecting granting immunity of public lecture and expression. The National fusion Against Censorship (NCAC) is a group of 50 non-profit organizations throughout the nation such as the American Ethical Union (AEU) and the National Communication Association (NCA) who educate the prevalent and policy makers about threats to free expression mobilize them to take action to oppose censorship and assist in those efforts facilitate communications between local activists and national o rganizations and devise new educational, advocacy, and media strategies to create a more hospitable environment for free speech and artistic freedom ( burster Statement).The NCAC believes that a healthy, functional democracy is defined by freedom of communication, and the inability to communicate is fatal to moral, artistic and intellectual growth ( missionary station Statement). All groups united against censorship believe that it represents an unreasonable tot up of power and dictatorship over the minds and intellectual capacity of all people.However, the FCC has encountered many severe censorship issues in recent years concerning public broadcasts with inappropriate content. February 1, 2004 will forever be remembered non for an exciting Super roll game, but for Janet Jacksons live wardrobe malfunction on CBS in front of millions of football fans. CBS owner Viacom was fined $550,000 for the half-time show broadcast, which the FCC state was in apparent violation of the broadcas t indecency standard (Lehrer).After the Janet Jackson incident occurred, the FCC began imposing greater fines for programs that show indecent, profane or obscene content (Remote Control Indecency Legislation Raises Fines and Fears). In december of 2004, the FCC fined 111 television stations that broadcasted the CBS show Without a track down for a record $3.6 million, which suggested that teenagers were involved in a sexual orgy. CBS defended the Without a Trace episode, saying the episode contained an important and socially relevant storyline warning parents to act upon greater supervision of their teenage children (Bosman).Since then, many other television shows have been fined for indecency, which has led to the detriment of station programming because stations are worried about being charged. This string of massive fines given to inappropriate airings has led broadcasters to self-censor their programs using five-second delays especially on entertainment, sport and sexually st ated television shows (Remote Control Indecency Legislation Raises Fines and Fears).The United KingdomIn the United Kingdom, the Office of Communications (Ofcom) is in charge of regulating all of the private commercial channels, including iTV, Five and Channel 4. Ofcom was first established as the overseer of communications industries by the Office of Communications Act 2002, combining the responsibilities of the Broadcasting Standards Commission, the Independent Television Commission, the Radio Authority, and the Director ecumenical of Communications into one regulating group (statutory Duties and Regulatory Principles). Ofcoms responsibilities includeEnsuring the optimal use of the electro-magnetic spectrum ensuring that a wide range of electronic communications services including high speed data services is useable throughout the UK ensuring a wide range of TV and radio services of high quality and wide appeal maintaining plurality in the provision of broadcasting applying ade quate protection for audiences against discourtesy or damaging corporeal and applying adequate protection for audiences against unfairness or the infringement of privacy (Statutory Duties and Regulatory Principles).According to the Ofcom Broadcasting Code, multiple sections were established to set proper standards for television broadcasting. Two codes related to the censorship of inappropriate textile are to prevent harm to children under age 18, and to avert offensive or harmful substantive from being broadcasted. Section One Protecting the Under-Eighteens states real(a) that might seriously impair the physical, mental or moral development of people under eighteen must not be broadcast.Children must also be protected by appropriate scheduling from stuff that is unsuitable for them (The Ofcom Broadcasting Code). Section Two Harm and crime asserts In applying in general accepted standards broadcasters must ensure that material which may cause offence is justified by the c ontext. Such material may include, but is not limited to, offensive language, violence, sex, sexual violence, humiliation, distress, violation of military personnel dignity, discriminatory treatment or language (The Ofcom Broadcasting Code). immunity of expression and responsibility are considered hand in hand by the Code, which is why each programmer must obey regulations that apply to each section.Although Ofcom controls the private channels in the United Kingdom, the government-owned stations such as the BBC have their own indecency regulations. The BBC has a more relaxed policy for indecency, which is know as the Watershed policy. From 9pm the TV watershed helps parents protect children from unsuitable material. In all but exceptional circumstances, programmes before 9pm are suitable for general audiences including children.From 9pm they are progressively suitable only for adults ( declineency and the TV watershed). The BBC and other public broadcasting stations in the United K ingdom cuss on parent support and program warnings to prevent children from exposure to indecent, profane or obscene content, not on censorship rules and expensive fines. In the United Kingdom, the lack of universal policies and regulations on censoring inappropriate content of all television channels shows the overall laissez-faire attitude toward television censorship.In general, the United Kingdom fines programs and stations for going over television program limits or blatantly lying on television, but does not often penalize stations for showing morally, politically or scrupulously indecent content. However, there is extremely limited information on television programs that have been in violation of the Ofcom Broadcasting Code or BBC regulations that have been fined for airing inappropriate material.In one case, an episode of Jerry Springer The opera house was brought to court by Christian evangelists trying to prosecute specify Thompson, the BBCs director general. According to Stephen Green, National Director of the Christian Voice, the show on BBC2 featured scenes depicting Christ wearing a nappy and pest had clearly crossed the blasphemy threshold (Petre). However, the show was not outlaw on BBC2 or prosecuted for blasphemous content after being brought to court.Mark Mullins, who represents Stephen Green and the Christian Voice, said No prosecution for blasphemy can be brought against the BBC. That is tantamount to saying that blasphemy is of little, if any, relevance in straight offs society (Petre). Compared to the United Kingdom, whose regulations allow for greater rein of freedom of speech and expression, the United States has much harsher regulations about censorship and blocking harmful content from the airwaves.ComparisonThe United States and the United Kingdom both deal with complaints from television viewing audience on a daily basis however, the viewers in the United Kingdom complain there is not full censorship, while the viewers in the United States feel there is resemblingwise much censorship.According to media keep abreast-uk, an organization that campaigns for decency and accountability in the media, they believe that television has become toxic to viewers, and no longer represents reality or enforces censorship of inappropriate material. Violence, sex and bad language is so common on TVHowever, Parliament has approved laws which say that programmes must meet with generally accepted standards and that the public should be protected from offensive and harmful material. This law is being ignored and viewers rights are being overridden in the quest for ratings, audience shareand controversy (mediawatch-uk).Many organizations like mediawatch-uk have been established to apply greater pressure on the regulating bodies like Ofcom and BBC, convinced they have not responded sufficiently to the public concern. On the opposing side, the United States has many organizations like the NCAC that argue regulations set o n American television are too severe, and do not allow for the freedom to exercise the rights guaranteed in the First Amendment.According to Stephen Rohde, a lawyer who specializes in First Amendment concerns, It is not in the public interest for certain straitlaced groups to dictate what the American people can see on television, when the material is constitutionally protected and violates no laws.Such groups remain free to exercise their constitutional rights to publicly condemn any programming they find offensive and to press the OFF button on the remote (Censorship on Television When Crying Indecency Goes Too Far). Although television has become a highly advanced medium in recent years, there are extreme differences between the enforcement of censorship regulations in the United Kingdom and the United States. Censorship is a central issue in television, but it is nearly impossible for either country to tote up on what constitutes inappropriate material, and how it should be de alt with to satisfy the majority of viewers.ConclusionBoth the United Kingdom and the United States would benefit from finding a balanced medium by setting strict censorship laws, while still allowing for freedom of speech and expression. During certain hours of the day, especially after 9pm, parents and their children should be highly advised that there may be inappropriate content in the television material. Therefore, censorship should be enforced while children are more likely to watch television, and more relaxed when the audience becomes more mature at night.However, because the United Kingdom has different restrictive bodies governing the public and private television channels, they should agree on certain guidelines to avoid censorship issues, as well as complaints from unsatisfied viewers. The United States should relax their policies on censorship by not broadcasting harmful programs during the day, or on channels with consistent childlike viewers.Since the biggest conce rn overriding the censorship problems is obscene, profane or indecent material affecting children, their moral and religious beliefs should be taken into account when establishing regulatory principles. Around the world, countries have different views on the amount of censorship necessary to protect their audiences from harmful television.The United Kingdom and the United States are just two examples of very dissimilar regulatory systems, based on how their country feels censorship is necessary. In the end, it is the balance of appropriateness and inappropriateness, freedom of expression and freedom of censorship, that must take into account all age groups, moral views and the force of television on its viewers.Works CitedAbout the FCC. FCC. Federal Communications Commission. 10 dec 2007 .Bosman, Julie. TV Stations Fined Over CBS Show Deemed to Be Indecent. Business. 16 Mar 2006. The New York Times. 11 decline 2007 .Censorship on Television When Crying Indecency Goes Too Far. New s. 18 Feb 2005. PEN Center USA. 13 Dec 2007 .Decency and the TV watershed. Reports, policies and guidelines. British Broadcasting Company. 12 Dec 2007 .Lehrer, Jim. Television Indecency. Online News Hour. 23 Sept 2004. Public Broadcasting Service. 11 Dec 2007 .mediawatch-uk. About Us. 2007. mediawatch-uk. 13 Dec 2007 .Mission Statement. About NCAC. National Coalition Against Censorship. 10 Dec 2007 .Obscene, Indecent, and Profane Broadcasts. Consumer Governmental Affairs Bureau. 24 Sept 2007. Federal Communications Commission. 10 Dec 2007 .OfCom. TV. Office of Communications. 10 Dec 2007 .Petre, Jonathan. Jerry Springer ruling weakens blasphemy law. News. 07 Dec 2007. telegraph.co.uk. 13 Dec 2007 .Remote Control Indecency Legislation Raises Fines and Fears. National Coalition Against Censorship. 11 Dec 2007 .Statutory Duties and Regulatory Principles. About OfCom. Office of Communications. 12 Dec 2007 .The Ofcom Broadcasting Code. Ofcom Broadcasting Code. 25 July 2005. Office of Co mmunications. 12 Dec 2007 .